The National Labor Relations Board petitioned the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to enforce an order against the Estate of Nathan Gladstone, which did business as Fassetts Bakery. The Board found that the bakery violated sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act by interfering with employees' union activities and discriminating against union members. The Court of Appeals granted enforcement of the Board's order, finding that the Board's decision was supported by evidence in the record.
The National Labor Relations Board petitioned the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to enforce an order against the Estate of Nathan Gladstone, which did business as Fassetts Bakery. The Board found that the bakery violated sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act by interfering with employees' union activities and discriminating against union members. The Court of Appeals granted enforcement of the Board's order, finding that the Board's decision was supported by evidence in the record.
The National Labor Relations Board petitioned the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to enforce an order against the Estate of Nathan Gladstone, which did business as Fassetts Bakery. The Board found that the bakery violated sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act by interfering with employees' union activities and discriminating against union members. The Court of Appeals granted enforcement of the Board's order, finding that the Board's decision was supported by evidence in the record.
v. ESTATE of Nathan GLADSTONE, d/b/a Fassetts Bakery, Respondent. No. 382, Docket 29334.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 17, 1965. Decided March 18, 1965.
Michael N. Sohn, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L.
Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davision, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Paul D. Sheehey, Burlington, Vt., for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
We grant enforcement to the order of the National Labor Relations Board,
reported at 147 N.L.R.B. No. 54 (1964). The Board's finding that the respondent violated 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(1) and (3), is supported by the record.
National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union No. 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, 303 F.2d 444, 3rd Cir. (1962)
National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business As Clarion Fruit Company, 313 F.2d 633, 3rd Cir. (1963)
National Labor Relations Board, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, 375 F.2d 1011, 3rd Cir. (1967)
United States of America Ex Rel. Dominick Campagne v. Harold W. Follette, Warden of Green Haven State Prison, Stormville, N.Y., 419 F.2d 833, 2d Cir. (1969)
National Labor Relations Board v. L. B. Hosiery Co., Incorporated, and Lee Maisel, Doing Business As Myerstown Hosiery Mills, 187 F.2d 335, 3rd Cir. (1951)