Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Manufacturing & Supply Co., 474 F.2d 1272, 4th Cir. (1973)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The National Labor Relations Board found that Universal Manufacturing & Supply Company violated the National Labor Relations Act by engaging in unlawful surveillance of a union meeting, unlawfully interrogating an employee, and laying off two employees due to their prounion activities. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the NLRB's order without oral argument, as the NLRB's decision was supported by substantial evidence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1973-03-08 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 474 F.2d 1272 Docket: 72-2227

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The National Labor Relations Board found that Universal Manufacturing & Supply Company violated the National Labor Relations Act by engaging in unlawful surveillance of a union meeting, unlawfully interrogating an employee, and laying off two employees due to their prounion activities. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the NLRB's order without oral argument, as the NLRB's decision was supported by substantial evidence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Manufacturing & Supply Co., 474 F.2d 1272, 4th Cir. (1973)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The National Labor Relations Board found that Universal Manufacturing & Supply Company violated the National Labor Relations Act by engaging in unlawful surveillance of a union meeting, unlawfully interrogating an employee, and laying off two employees due to their prounion activities. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the NLRB's order without oral argument, as the NLRB's decision was supported by substantial evidence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    474 F.

    2d 1272
    82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2895, 70 Lab.Cas. P 13,486

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,


    v.
    UNIVERSAL MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY CO.,
    Respondent.
    No. 72-2227.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 15, 1973.
    Decided March 8, 1973.

    Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen.


    Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Joseph E.
    Mayer, and Wiliam H. DuRoss, III, Washington, D. C., for the petitioner.
    Yelverton Cowherd, Jr., Columbia, S. C., and George H. Grant, Aiken, S.
    C., for respondent.
    Before BUTZNER, RUSSELL and FIELD, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    On July 31, 1972 the National Labor Relations Board found that Universal
    Manufacturing & Supply Company had violated Sec. 8(a)(1) of the National
    Labor Relations Act by engaging in unlawful surveillance of a union meeting
    and unlawfully interrogating an employee. The Board also found that Universal
    violated Sec. 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by laying off two employees, Rodney
    Ready and Robert Wright, because of their prounion activities. The decision
    and order are reported at 198 NLRB No. 88. Upon consideration of the briefs
    and administrative record, we enforce the Board's order without oral argument
    because it is supported by substantial evidence.

    Enforcement granted.

    You might also like