Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John C. Thomas v. William W. Consodine, J.C.C. T/a, Thomas C. D'avella, Esq., and Martha C. Belle, Esq, 434 F.2d 1052, 3rd Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    The court reviewed a case involving John C. Thomas appealing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Thomas appealed a ruling involving William W. Consodine, J.C.C. T/A, Thomas C. D'Avella, Esq., and Martha C. Belle, Esq. After reviewing the record and considering briefs from both parties, the court found no merit to Thomas' contentions and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-12-11 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 434 F.2d 1052 Docket: 18900_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The court reviewed a case involving John C. Thomas appealing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Thomas appealed a ruling involving William W. Consodine, J.C.C. T/A, Thomas C. D'Avella, Esq., and Martha C. Belle, Esq. After reviewing the record and considering briefs from both parties, the court found no merit to Thomas' contentions and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    John C. Thomas v. William W. Consodine, J.C.C. T/a, Thomas C. D'avella, Esq., and Martha C. Belle, Esq, 434 F.2d 1052, 3rd Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The court reviewed a case involving John C. Thomas appealing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Thomas appealed a ruling involving William W. Consodine, J.C.C. T/A, Thomas C. D'Avella, Esq., and Martha C. Belle, Esq. After reviewing the record and considering briefs from both parties, the court found no merit to Thomas' contentions and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    434 F.

    2d 1052

    John C. THOMAS, Appellant,


    v.
    William W. CONSODINE, J.C.C. T/A, Thomas C. D'Avella,
    Esq., and Martha C. Belle, Esq.
    No. 18900.

    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.


    Submitted December 8, 1970.
    Decided December 11, 1970.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New
    Jersey; Anthony T. Augelli, Judge.
    John C. Thomas, pro se.
    Stephen Skillman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Trenton, N. J., (Malcolm S. Zlotkin,
    Deputy Atty. Gen., George F. Kugler, Jr., Atty. Gen. of New Jersey,
    Trenton, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before ALDISERT, ADAMS and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    PER CURIAM:

    After a careful review of the record and careful consideration of the parties'
    briefs, we cannot subscribe to appellants' contentions. The judgment will
    therefore be affirmed.

    You might also like