The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Bettie and Lloyd Murphy sued Helena Rubenstein Company and H. J. Titus, Inc. for an unspecified cause of action. The District Court ruled in favor of the defendants. In a brief, three sentence opinion, the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's order, finding no errors upon review of the record.
Bettie Murphy and Lloyd Murphy, Her Husband, and Lloyd Murphy, in His Own Right v. Helena Rubenstein Company, a Corporation of the State of New York, and H. J. Titus, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New York, Jointly, Severally And/or in the Alternative, 376 F.2d 265, 3rd Cir. (1967)
The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Bettie and Lloyd Murphy sued Helena Rubenstein Company and H. J. Titus, Inc. for an unspecified cause of action. The District Court ruled in favor of the defendants. In a brief, three sentence opinion, the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's order, finding no errors upon review of the record.
The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Bettie and Lloyd Murphy sued Helena Rubenstein Company and H. J. Titus, Inc. for an unspecified cause of action. The District Court ruled in favor of the defendants. In a brief, three sentence opinion, the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's order, finding no errors upon review of the record.
Bettie MURPHY and Lloyd Murphy, Her Husband, and Lloyd
Murphy, in His Own Right, Appellants, v. HELENA RUBENSTEIN COMPANY, a Corporation of the State of New York, and H. J. Titus, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New York, Jointly, Severally and/or in the Alternative. No. 16202.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued March 30, 1967. Decided April 17, 1967.
Mario A. iavicoli, Camden, N.J. (Arthur E. Ballen, Camden, N.J., on the
brief), for appellants. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., Haddonfield, N.J. (McCord, Farrell, Eynon & Munyon, Haddonfield, N.J., on the brief), for appellees. Before KALODNER and SEITZ, Circuit Judges, and BODY, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
National Labor Relations Board v. L. B. Hosiery Co., Incorporated, and Lee Maisel, Doing Business As Myerstown Hosiery Mills, 187 F.2d 335, 3rd Cir. (1951)
Rock-Hill-Uris, Inc., and Hilton Hotels Corporation v. Ivan C. McLeod As Regional Director of The National Labor Relations Board, Second Region, 344 F.2d 697, 2d Cir. (1965)
United States v. Sidney Steinschreiber, Doing Business As Sidcaps Laboratories, John P. Calise, Westchester Blood Service, Inc., 326 F.2d 759, 2d Cir. (1964)
Robert Ades v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Albert J. Ades and Sylvia Ades v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Alan Ades and Ruth Ades v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph Ades and Rachel Ades v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 316 F.2d 734, 2d Cir. (1963)
Esther Y. D'Amico and Frank D'amico, Her Husband v. Leo T. Mahon, and Third-Party v. Paul James Daily and Richard A. Neish, JR., Third-Party, 346 F.2d 567, 3rd Cir. (1965)
Hugh R. Sharp, Jr. and Ada B. W. Sharp, His Wife v. United States of America. Bayard Sharp and Mary M. Sharp, His Wife v. United States, 303 F.2d 783, 3rd Cir. (1962)