Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Arthur Anthony Rocco, Alias Arthur Lewis, 193 F.2d 1008, 3rd Cir. (1952)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court which denied the defendant's motions for judgment of acquittal or a new trial following a jury verdict of guilty on eighteen counts in an indictment. The appellate court found the district court's opinion denying the motions to be exhaustive and well-reasoned, and it incorporated the lower court's analysis and conclusions rather than adding further discussion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1952-02-04 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 193 F.2d 1008 Docket: 10569_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court which denied the defendant's motions for judgment of acquittal or a new trial following a jury verdict of guilty on eighteen counts in an indictment. The appellate court found the district court's opinion denying the motions to be exhaustive and well-reasoned, and it incorporated the lower court's analysis and conclusions rather than adding further discussion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    United States v. Arthur Anthony Rocco, Alias Arthur Lewis, 193 F.2d 1008, 3rd Cir. (1952)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court which denied the defendant's motions for judgment of acquittal or a new trial following a jury verdict of guilty on eighteen counts in an indictment. The appellate court found the district court's opinion denying the motions to be exhaustive and well-reasoned, and it incorporated the lower court's analysis and conclusions rather than adding further discussion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    193 F.

    2d 1008

    UNITED STATES of America


    v.
    Arthur Anthony ROCCO, alias Arthur Lewis, Appellant.
    No. 10569.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued Jan. 25, 1952.
    Decided Feb. 4, 1952.

    Charles J. Margiotti, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Vincent M. Casey and Margiotti &


    Casey, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    Edward C. Boyle, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
    Before KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges, and STEWART,
    District judge.
    PER CURIAM.

    Following a jury verdict of guilty on eighteen counts contained in an


    indictment, the defendant, in the Court below, moved for judgment of acquittal
    or in the alternative for a new trial. The District Court in an exhaustive and
    well-reasoned opinion, 99 F.Supp. 746, considered and then denied the
    defendant's motions.

    We need add nothing to what has been so well stated by Judge Marsh in his
    careful analysis of the defendant's contentions in support of the denied motions
    and accordingly the judgment of the Court below will be affirmed upon his
    opinion.

    You might also like