Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Robert E. Schoonover, 360 F.2d 165, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Robert Schoonover was convicted on multiple counts related to falsely uttering checks, forging a check, and mail fraud. Schoonover appealed, arguing that the evidence did not justify conviction on certain counts. However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit examined the record and determined that the evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. The court also considered Schoonover's other arguments related to jury instructions and evidentiary rulings, but found no reversible errors. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's judgment and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1966-05-06 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 360 F.2d 165 Docket: 15618

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Schoonover was convicted on multiple counts related to falsely uttering checks, forging a check, and mail fraud. Schoonover appealed, arguing that the evidence did not justify conviction on certain counts. However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit examined the record and determined that the evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. The court also considered Schoonover's other arguments related to jury instructions and evidentiary rulings, but found no reversible errors. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's judgment and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    United States v. Robert E. Schoonover, 360 F.2d 165, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Schoonover was convicted on multiple counts related to falsely uttering checks, forging a check, and mail fraud. Schoonover appealed, arguing that the evidence did not justify conviction on certain counts. However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit examined the record and determined that the evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. The court also considered Schoonover's other arguments related to jury instructions and evidentiary rulings, but found no reversible errors. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's judgment and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    360 F.

    2d 165

    UNITED STATES of America


    v.
    Robert E. SCHOONOVER, Appellant.
    No. 15618.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued April 19, 1966.
    Decided May 6, 1966.

    Edwin Krawitz, Stroudsburg, Pa., for appellant.


    Carlon M. O'Malley, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Scranton, Pa. (Bernard J.
    Brown, U. S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    The appellant has been convicted under an indictment charging in several


    counts falsely uttering two separate checks, forging one check and mail fraud.
    On certain counts the appellant complains that the evidence did not justify
    conviction. Our independent examination of the record satisfies us that the
    evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. Other points concerning the
    court's charge and rulings on the admission of evidence have been considered,
    but we find no reversible error.

    The judgment and sentence of the District Court will be affirmed.

    You might also like