Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James Earl Parrish v. David A. Williams, Warden, 956 F.2d 1162, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Earl Parrish's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously denied habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 956 F.2d 1162 Docket: 91-7603

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Earl Parrish's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously denied habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    James Earl Parrish v. David A. Williams, Warden, 956 F.2d 1162, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Earl Parrish's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously denied habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    956 F.

    2d 1162

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    James Earl PARRISH, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    David A. WILLIAMS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 91-7603.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 28, 1992.
    Decided Feb. 26, 1992.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-709-R)
    James Earl Parrish, appellant pro se.
    Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for
    appellee.
    W.D.Va., [Appeal after remand from 948 F.2d 1282]
    DISMISSED.
    Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    James Earl Parrish seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas
    corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and
    the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the

    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Parrish v. Williams, No. CA-90709-R (W.D.Va. May 1, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like