Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr. v. David A. Williams, Warden, Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr. v. David A. Williams, Warden, 952 F.2d 395, 4th Cir. (1992)
Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr. v. David A. Williams, Warden, Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr. v. David A. Williams, Warden, 952 F.2d 395, 4th Cir. (1992)
2d 395
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Alexandria. (CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM), James C.
Cacheris, Chief District Judge.
Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., appellant pro se.
Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Lewis Howard appeals from the district court's orders denying relief
under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988).* Our review of the records and the district
court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Williams, No. CA-90147-AM, CA-90-125-AM (E.D.Va. June 4, 1991). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED.