Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Corrigan v. Howard, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Mark Corrigan filed a complaint against various defendants pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. Corrigan appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6660

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Corrigan filed a complaint against various defendants pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. Corrigan appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Corrigan v. Howard, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Corrigan filed a complaint against various defendants pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. Corrigan appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6660

    MARK CORRIGAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MALCOLM J. HOWARD; THOMAS
    HAYES; DAVID W. DANIEL;
    MacKenzie, Incorporated,

    P. SWAIN; ANNE
    KEN MACKENZIE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:07-CT-3023-BO)

    Submitted: July 24, 2007

    Decided:

    July 31, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark

    Corrigan

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint


    filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
    of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Corrigan v. Howard, No. 5:07-CT-

    3023-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like