Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McCarroll v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal of a district court's denial of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Edward Lonnie McCarroll and Samuel C. Ross. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. Additionally, the court denies twelve motions seeking to add a total of fifteen individuals not involved in the original district court case as parties to the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-05-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6061

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal of a district court's denial of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Edward Lonnie McCarroll and Samuel C. Ross. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. Additionally, the court denies twelve motions seeking to add a total of fifteen individuals not involved in the original district court case as parties to the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views3 pages

    McCarroll v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal of a district court's denial of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Edward Lonnie McCarroll and Samuel C. Ross. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. Additionally, the court denies twelve motions seeking to add a total of fifteen individuals not involved in the original district court case as parties to the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6061

    EDWARD LONNIE MCCARROLL; SAMUEL C. ROSS,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    and
    MICHAEL LUCAS,
    Plaintiff,
    versus
    THEODIS BECK; JUANITA BAKER; OFFENDER
    POPULATION UNIFIED SYSTEMS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-03-863-5-BO)

    Submitted: May 13, 2004

    Decided:

    May 18, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Samuel C. Ross, Appellants Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Lonnie McCarroll and Samuel C. Ross appeal the
    district courts order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. 1983
    (2000)

    complaint.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See McCarroll v. Beck, No. CA-03-863-5-BO

    (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2003).

    The court has also received twelve

    motions seeking to add a total of fifteen individuals who were not


    parties to this case in the district court as parties to this
    appeal.

    We deny these motions.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like