Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • David Felton v. Gary Dixon Melvin C. Creecy James D. Barber Ken Harris, 823 F.2d 547, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where David Felton filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against four defendants. The district court denied relief to Felton. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision without oral argument, finding the issues had been authoritatively decided previously. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 12, 1987 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-06-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 823 F.2d 547 Docket: 87-6052

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where David Felton filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against four defendants. The district court denied relief to Felton. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision without oral argument, finding the issues had been authoritatively decided previously. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 12, 1987 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views1 page

    David Felton v. Gary Dixon Melvin C. Creecy James D. Barber Ken Harris, 823 F.2d 547, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where David Felton filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against four defendants. The district court denied relief to Felton. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision without oral argument, finding the issues had been authoritatively decided previously. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 12, 1987 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    823 F.

    2d 547
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    David FELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Gary DIXON; Melvin C. Creecy; James D. Barber; Ken
    Harris,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 87-6052

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 27, 1987.
    Decided June 24, 1987.

    David Felton, appellant pro se.


    Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
    Before CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Felton v. Dixon, C/A No. 86-846-CRT (E.D.N.C., March 12,
    1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like