Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dennis Lee Fleek v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, Respondent, 838 F.2d 466, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    27 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner, Dennis Lee Fleek, seeking habeas corpus relief. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Fleek. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues previously decided by authoritative decisions. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-01-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 838 F.2d 466 Docket: 87-7178

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner, Dennis Lee Fleek, seeking habeas corpus relief. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Fleek. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues previously decided by authoritative decisions. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    27 views2 pages

    Dennis Lee Fleek v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, Respondent, 838 F.2d 466, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner, Dennis Lee Fleek, seeking habeas corpus relief. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Fleek. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues previously decided by authoritative decisions. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    838 F.

    2d 466
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Dennis Lee FLEEK, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE,
    LEWISBURG,
    PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent- Appellee.
    No. 87-7178.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Nov. 19, 1987.
    Decided: Jan. 20, 1988.

    Dennis Lee Fleek, pro se.


    Jillyn Kaberle Schulze, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for
    appellee.
    Before WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order refusing
    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 is without merit. Because
    the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense
    with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the
    district court. Fleek v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, C/A No. 84-15HM (D.Md. April 21, 1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like