Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Auton v. Emery, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes two appeals by Winston V. Auton of orders by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints against Ann Emery and Rickie Robinson. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings in both cases, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7771

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes two appeals by Winston V. Auton of orders by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints against Ann Emery and Rickie Robinson. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings in both cases, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Auton v. Emery, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Winston V. Auton of orders by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints against Ann Emery and Rickie Robinson. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings in both cases, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7771

    WINSTON V. AUTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ANN EMERY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    No. 96-6214

    WINSTON V. AUTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICKIE ROBINSON,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
    Judge. (CA-95-900-5-CT-BO, CA-96-57)
    Submitted:

    March 21, 1996

    Decided:

    April 10, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Winston V. Auton, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed
    the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Auton v. Emery, No. CA-95-900-5-CT-BO, and Auton v.
    Robinson, No. CA-96-57 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 1995 and Jan. 26, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like