Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Webb v. Bristol Cty Sheriffs, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Bernard Webb filed a § 1983 lawsuit against the Bristol City Sheriff's Office and others alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Webb appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Webb's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7948

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Bernard Webb filed a § 1983 lawsuit against the Bristol City Sheriff's Office and others alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Webb appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Webb's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Webb v. Bristol Cty Sheriffs, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bernard Webb filed a § 1983 lawsuit against the Bristol City Sheriff's Office and others alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Webb appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Webb's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7948

    BERNARD CHESTER WEBB,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BRISTOL CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; HOWARD
    BARNES, Sheriff; MIKE SAYLER, Medic,

    E.
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-95-643-R)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 29, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Bernard Chester Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Ray Minor, ELLIOTT,
    LAWSON & POMRENKE, Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Webb v. Bristol City Sheriff's Office, No. CA-95-643-R (W.D.
    Va. Nov. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of
    counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like