Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Godfrey v. Dr. Long, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Michael Gray Godfrey in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying relief as stated in its January 9, 2012 ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6168

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Michael Gray Godfrey in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying relief as stated in its January 9, 2012 ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Michael Godfrey v. Dr. Long, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Michael Gray Godfrey in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying relief as stated in its January 9, 2012 ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6168

    MICHAEL GRAY GODFREY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DR. LONG; DISCHARGE NURSE MIKE,
    Lumberton Correctional Center,

    Central

    Prison;

    HEAD

    NURSE,

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:10-ct-03105-BO)

    Submitted:

    April 19, 2012

    Decided:

    April 26, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Gray Godfrey, Appellant Pro Se. Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch,


    Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh,
    North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth
    Street, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina;
    Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Gray

    Godfrey

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Godfrey v. Long, No. 5:10-ct-03105-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9,

    2012).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like