Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Harley v. Bradford, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Stanley Harley filed a civil rights complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Harley appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Harley on his civil rights complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6278

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stanley Harley filed a civil rights complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Harley appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Harley on his civil rights complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Harley v. Bradford, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stanley Harley filed a civil rights complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Harley appealed the district court's decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Harley on his civil rights complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6278

    STANLEY HARLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KENNETH BRADFORD; DONALD KITT; BERNARD WALKER;
    VIOLA BLACK; JOHN DELOACH; VALERIE JONES;
    SHIRLEY S. MARACHESI; GEORGE T. HAGAN; CARL J.
    FREDERICK; UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (6:06-cv-01852-GRA)

    Submitted: June 21, 2007

    Decided:

    June 28, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Harley, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr.,


    Keely Mikhael McComb McCoy, CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC,
    Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley

    Harley

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Harley v. Bradford,

    No. 6:06-cv-01852-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like