Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Yagoub Mohamed, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Yagoub M. Mohamed appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and supplemental petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny the petitions for the reasons stated in that court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6607

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Yagoub M. Mohamed appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and supplemental petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny the petitions for the reasons stated in that court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Yagoub Mohamed, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Yagoub M. Mohamed appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and supplemental petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny the petitions for the reasons stated in that court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6607

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    YAGOUB M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:01-cr-00177-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2014

    Decided:

    August 26, 2014

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Yagoub M. Mohamed, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Calvin Moore,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Gregg Robert Nivala, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Yagoub M. Mohamed appeals the district courts order
    denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his
    supplemental petition.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Mohamed, No. 3:01-cr-

    00177-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2013).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like