Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re Dee Farmer, 888 F.2d 1385, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The petitioner Dee Farmer filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel action on his habeas corpus petition that was pending in district court. The appeals court reviewed the district court's actions and found that there had not been undue delay that would warrant intervening at that time. Therefore, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-10-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 888 F.2d 1385 Docket: 89-8029

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner Dee Farmer filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel action on his habeas corpus petition that was pending in district court. The appeals court reviewed the district court's actions and found that there had not been undue delay that would warrant intervening at that time. Therefore, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    In Re Dee Farmer, 888 F.2d 1385, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The petitioner Dee Farmer filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel action on his habeas corpus petition that was pending in district court. The appeals court reviewed the district court's actions and found that there had not been undue delay that would warrant intervening at that time. Therefore, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    888 F.

    2d 1385
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    In re Dee FARMER, Petitioner.
    No. 89-8029.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 19, 1989.
    Decided Oct. 10, 1989.

    Dee Farmer, petitioner pro se.


    Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Dee Farmer, a federal prisoner, has petitioned this Court for a writ of
    mandamus. He complains of the district court's delay in ruling on his habeas
    corpus petition. Based on our review of the district court's actions in this case,
    we find that there has been no undue delay which would warrant our
    intervention at this time. We therefore deny the petition. Leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis is granted.

    PETITION DENIED.

    You might also like