Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re Letitia Magini, 911 F.2d 723, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Letitia Magini filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on her 28 U.S.C. §2255 petition. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition for writ of mandamus because the district court had acted on the §2255 petition, rendering the mandamus petition moot. The Fourth Circuit denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and denied the mandamus petition as moot, finding that oral arguments would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-07-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 911 F.2d 723 Docket: 90-8021

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Letitia Magini filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on her 28 U.S.C. §2255 petition. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition for writ of mandamus because the district court had acted on the §2255 petition, rendering the mandamus petition moot. The Fourth Circuit denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and denied the mandamus petition as moot, finding that oral arguments would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    In Re Letitia Magini, 911 F.2d 723, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Letitia Magini filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on her 28 U.S.C. §2255 petition. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition for writ of mandamus because the district court had acted on the §2255 petition, rendering the mandamus petition moot. The Fourth Circuit denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and denied the mandamus petition as moot, finding that oral arguments would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    911 F.

    2d 723
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    In re Letitia MAGINI, Petitioner.
    No. 90-8021.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 9, 1990.
    Decided July 23, 1990.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    Letitia Magini, petitioner pro se.
    PETITION DENIED.
    Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Letitia Magini, a federal prisoner, brought this petition for writ of mandamus
    alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on her 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 petition. Because the district court has acted on the Sec. 2255 petition, the
    petition for writ of mandamus is moot. In re: Magini, CR No. 82-94-C; C/A
    No. 89-188-P (W.D.N.C. June 6, 1990). Therefore, we deny leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis and deny the petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED.

    You might also like