Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Raymond Otell Banner v. United States Parole Commission Bob Guzik, 48 F.3d 1215, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Raymond Otell Banner filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Banner appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Banner's appeal based on their review of the record and district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-02 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 48 F.3d 1215 Docket: 94-6945

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Raymond Otell Banner filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Banner appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Banner's appeal based on their review of the record and district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Raymond Otell Banner v. United States Parole Commission Bob Guzik, 48 F.3d 1215, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Raymond Otell Banner filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Banner appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Banner's appeal based on their review of the record and district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    48 F.

    3d 1215
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Raymond Otell BANNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Bob Guzik,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 94-6945.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1995.
    Decided March 2, 1995.

    Raymond Otell Banner, Appellant pro se.


    Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Banner v. United States Parole Comm'n, No.
    HC-94-265-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like