Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Mario Alonzo Vaughn, 48 F.3d 1218, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The document is a court ruling affirming the denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no merit to the appeal after reviewing the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 48 F.3d 1218 Docket: 94-6716

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court ruling affirming the denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no merit to the appeal after reviewing the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    United States v. Mario Alonzo Vaughn, 48 F.3d 1218, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling affirming the denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no merit to the appeal after reviewing the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    48 F.

    3d 1218
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,


    v.
    Mario Alonzo VAUGHN, Defendant--Appellant.
    No. 94-6716.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1995.
    Decided March 14, 1995.

    Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,


    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal
    is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    United States v. Vaughn, Nos. CR-90-300; CR-90-301; CA-93-38-6 (M.D.N.C.
    June 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like