Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Felix D. Diaz, A/K/A Papo, 48 F.3d 1217, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Felix D. Diaz appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Diaz's appeal. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 8, 1994 order denying Diaz's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-07 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 48 F.3d 1217 Docket: 94-7081

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Felix D. Diaz appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Diaz's appeal. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 8, 1994 order denying Diaz's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    United States v. Felix D. Diaz, A/K/A Papo, 48 F.3d 1217, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Felix D. Diaz appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Diaz's appeal. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 8, 1994 order denying Diaz's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    48 F.

    3d 1217
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


    v.
    Felix D. DIAZ, a/k/a Papo, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 94-7081.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
    Decided March 7, 1995.

    Felix D. Diaz, Appellant Pro Se.


    David Scott Lavine, Perry Scott Bechky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
    STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Diaz, Nos. CR-91-322-A and
    CA-94-519 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like