Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bertual L. Holland v. Earl Beshears, Warden, 50 F.3d 6, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Bertual L. Holland on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning as adequately presented in its opinion dated October 31, 1994. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented for the court to make its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 50 F.3d 6 Docket: 94-7292

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Bertual L. Holland on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning as adequately presented in its opinion dated October 31, 1994. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented for the court to make its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Bertual L. Holland v. Earl Beshears, Warden, 50 F.3d 6, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Bertual L. Holland on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning as adequately presented in its opinion dated October 31, 1994. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented for the court to make its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    50 F.

    3d 6

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Bertual L. HOLLAND, Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    Earl BESHEARS, Warden, Respondent--Appellee.
    No. 94-7292.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: February 16, 1995
    Decided: March 20, 1995

    Bertual L. Holland, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2241 (1988) petition.* Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Holland v. Beshears, No. CA-94-2855-MJG
    (D. Md. Oct. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    As the district court noted, Appellant's action was incorrectly captioned as one
    pursuant to 28 U.S.C Sec. 2254 (1988)

    You might also like