Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Charles H. Holloway v. John H. Painter Bobby Haulk J. A. Rogers, 972 F.2d 340, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Charles H. Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants that was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Holloway's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 972 F.2d 340 Docket: 92-6302

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Charles H. Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants that was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Holloway's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Charles H. Holloway v. John H. Painter Bobby Haulk J. A. Rogers, 972 F.2d 340, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Charles H. Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants that was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Holloway's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    972 F.

    2d 340

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Charles H. HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    John H. PAINTER; Bobby Haulk; J. A. Rogers, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 92-6302.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 11, 1992
    Decided: August 7, 1992

    Charles H. Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and
    BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Charles H. Holloway appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1988). Our review
    of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without
    merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holloway
    v. Painter, No. CA-92-49-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like