Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • George Bernard Shaw v. R.R. Overby, Correctional Sergeant J.K. Tuck, Registered Nurse, Defendants, 852 F.2d 566, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which George Bernard Shaw appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in district court against defendants R.R. Overby and J.K. Tuck. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Shaw's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-07-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 852 F.2d 566 Docket: 88-7596

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which George Bernard Shaw appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in district court against defendants R.R. Overby and J.K. Tuck. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Shaw's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    George Bernard Shaw v. R.R. Overby, Correctional Sergeant J.K. Tuck, Registered Nurse, Defendants, 852 F.2d 566, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which George Bernard Shaw appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in district court against defendants R.R. Overby and J.K. Tuck. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Shaw's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    852 F.

    2d 566
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    George Bernard SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    R.R. OVERBY, Correctional Sergeant; J.K. Tuck, Registered
    Nurse, Defendants- Appellees.
    No. 88-7596.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 31, 1988.
    Decided: July 22, 1988.

    George Bernard Shaw, appellant pro se.


    Stephen Douglas Rosenthal (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia),
    for appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    George Bernard Shaw appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Overby, C/A No. 87-782-N
    (E.D.Va. Mar. 10, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like