Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Norman Allen Ayers v. Marjorie A. Jennings Leronia A. Josey Commissioners Maryland Parole Commission, 852 F.2d 565, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Norman Allen Ayers filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against members of the Maryland Parole Commission which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Ayers' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion denying relief. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-07-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 852 F.2d 565 Docket: 88-6024

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Norman Allen Ayers filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against members of the Maryland Parole Commission which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Ayers' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion denying relief. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Norman Allen Ayers v. Marjorie A. Jennings Leronia A. Josey Commissioners Maryland Parole Commission, 852 F.2d 565, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Norman Allen Ayers filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against members of the Maryland Parole Commission which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Ayers' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion denying relief. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    852 F.

    2d 565
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Norman Allen AYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Marjorie A. JENNINGS; Leronia A. Josey; Commissioners
    Maryland Parole Commission, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-6024.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 31, 1988.
    Decided: July 20, 1988.

    Norman Allen Ayers, appellant pro se.


    Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Norman Allen Ayers appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Ayers v. Jennings, C/A No. 88-687-JH (D.Md.
    Mar. 15, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like