Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Atkins v. Warden Taylor Warden Saunders Doctor Carey, 51 F.3d 265, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from a district court's denial of relief on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Anthony Atkins against several prison officials. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 51 F.3d 265 Docket: 94-7028

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from a district court's denial of relief on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Anthony Atkins against several prison officials. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Anthony Atkins v. Warden Taylor Warden Saunders Doctor Carey, 51 F.3d 265, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from a district court's denial of relief on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Anthony Atkins against several prison officials. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    51 F.

    3d 265

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Warden TAYLOR; Warden Saunders; Doctor Carey,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 94-7028.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: March 15, 1995.
    Decided: March 31, 1995.

    Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Taylor, No. CA-94-745 (W.D.Va.
    Sept. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED..

    You might also like