Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William D. Zack v. W.J. Thompson, Warden, Fci Morgantown, 59 F.3d 169, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where William D. Zack filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against W.J. Thompson, the warden of FCI Morgantown. The district court denied relief on Zack's petition and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in its denial. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-06-26 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 59 F.3d 169 Docket: 95-6343

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where William D. Zack filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against W.J. Thompson, the warden of FCI Morgantown. The district court denied relief on Zack's petition and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in its denial. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    William D. Zack v. W.J. Thompson, Warden, Fci Morgantown, 59 F.3d 169, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where William D. Zack filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against W.J. Thompson, the warden of FCI Morgantown. The district court denied relief on Zack's petition and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in its denial. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    59 F.

    3d 169
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    William D. ZACK, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    W.J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, DefendantAppellee.
    No. 95-6343.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted May 18, 1995.
    Decided June 26, 1995.

    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,


    Senior Circuit Judge. William D. Zack, Appellant Pro Se.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Zack v. Thompson, No. CA-94-179-2 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 30
    & Feb. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like