Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Melvin James Clark v. Daniel T. Mahon, 59 F.3d 165, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Melvin James Clark's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Court of Appeals denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the district court's opinion in Clark v. Mahon, No. CA-94-480-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1995).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-06-22 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 59 F.3d 165 Docket: 95-6199

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Melvin James Clark's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Court of Appeals denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the district court's opinion in Clark v. Mahon, No. CA-94-480-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1995).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Melvin James Clark v. Daniel T. Mahon, 59 F.3d 165, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Melvin James Clark's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Court of Appeals denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the district court's opinion in Clark v. Mahon, No. CA-94-480-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1995).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    59 F.

    3d 165
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Melvin James CLARK, Petitioner--Appellant,


    v.
    Daniel T. MAHON, Respondent--Appellee.
    No. 95-6199.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 18, 1995.
    Decided: June 22, 1995.

    Melvin James Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel,


    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
    W.D.Va.
    DISMISSED.
    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Clark v. Mahon, No. CA-94-480-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like