Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    1) This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on August 21, 1996 regarding Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on their review of the record and district court opinion. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as they determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 95 F.3d 41 Docket: 96-6530

    Original Title

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Alan Katz Mary E. Shea, Esquire Pamela A. Sargent T.P. Kagey Buchanan County Circuit Court Unknown, 95 F.3d 41, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on August 21, 1996 regarding Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on their review of the record and district court opinion. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as they determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on August 21, 1996 regarding Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on their review of the record and district court opinion. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as they determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    95 F.

    3d 41

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Alan KATZ; Mary E. Shea, Esquire; Pamela A. Sargent; T.P.
    Kagey; Buchanan County Circuit Court; Unknown
    Defendants, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 96-6530.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 15, 1996.
    Decided Aug. 21, 1996.

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., appellant Pro Se.


    Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Altizer v. Katz, No. CA-96-241-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 8, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like