Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Keith Lawrence White v. E. Montgomery Tucker, 106 F.3d 394, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    Keith Lawrence White filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against E. Montgomery Tucker that was denied by the district court. White appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 106 F.3d 394 Docket: 96-7174

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Keith Lawrence White filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against E. Montgomery Tucker that was denied by the district court. White appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Keith Lawrence White v. E. Montgomery Tucker, 106 F.3d 394, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Keith Lawrence White filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against E. Montgomery Tucker that was denied by the district court. White appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    106 F.

    3d 394

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Keith Lawrence WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    E. Montgomery TUCKER, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-7174.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 14, 1997.
    Decided Feb. 6, 1997.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-836AM)
    Keith Lawrence White, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. White v. Tucker, No. CA-96-836-AM (E.D. Va. June 17,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like