Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Clay Vance Conner v. Kerry Donnelly, M.D., 72 F.3d 126, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    Clay Vance Conner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Kerry Donnelly, M.D. which was denied by the district court. Conner appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny relief on Conner's § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-12-15 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 72 F.3d 126 Docket: 95-7379

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Clay Vance Conner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Kerry Donnelly, M.D. which was denied by the district court. Conner appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny relief on Conner's § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Clay Vance Conner v. Kerry Donnelly, M.D., 72 F.3d 126, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Clay Vance Conner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Kerry Donnelly, M.D. which was denied by the district court. Conner appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny relief on Conner's § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    72 F.

    3d 126
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Clay Vance CONNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    Kerry DONNELLY, M.D., Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 95-7379.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 30, 1995.
    Decided Dec. 15, 1995.

    Clay Vance Conner, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN &
    HART, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-15)
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Conner v. Donnelly, No. CA-93-15 (W.D.Va.
    Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like