Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Harrison O'Neal v. Jerry Broadwater Ford Quillen, 92 F.3d 1180, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on August 5, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Michael Harrison O'Neal, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 92 F.3d 1180 Docket: 96-6367

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on August 5, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Michael Harrison O'Neal, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Michael Harrison O'Neal v. Jerry Broadwater Ford Quillen, 92 F.3d 1180, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on August 5, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Michael Harrison O'Neal, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    92 F.

    3d 1180

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Michael Harrison O'NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Jerry BROADWATER; Ford Quillen, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6367.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 23, 1996.
    Decided Aug. 5, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-229-R)
    Michael Harrison O'Neal, Appellant Pro Se.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. O'Neal v. Broadwater, No. CA-96-229-R (W.D.Va. Mar.
    6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like