Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lawrence Dukes v. W.K. Jones Alvin Newman, 76 F.3d 372, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Lawrence Dukes filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record and opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 76 F.3d 372 Docket: 95-7334

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lawrence Dukes filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record and opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lawrence Dukes v. W.K. Jones Alvin Newman, 76 F.3d 372, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lawrence Dukes filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record and opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    76 F.

    3d 372

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Lawrence DUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    W.K. JONES; Alvin Newman, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-7334.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 1, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95232-5-F)
    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    Lawrence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Dukes v. Jones, No. CA-95-232-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

    not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like