Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Harris v. John R. Williams S. Culbreath, 14 F.3d 594, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where William Harris filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John R. Williams and S. Culbreath that was denied by the district court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion and that the appeal was without merit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-01-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 14 F.3d 594 Docket: 93-6957

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where William Harris filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John R. Williams and S. Culbreath that was denied by the district court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion and that the appeal was without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    William Harris v. John R. Williams S. Culbreath, 14 F.3d 594, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where William Harris filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John R. Williams and S. Culbreath that was denied by the district court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion and that the appeal was without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    14 F.

    3d 594

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William HARRIS, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    John R. WILLIAMS; S. Culbreath, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-6957.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993
    Decided: Jan. 12, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93514-CRT-F)
    William Harris, appellant pro se.
    E.D.N.C.
    Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v.
    Williams, No. CA-93-514-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 1993). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like