Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3d 112
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-9410-5-CT-F)
Michael Rankins, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Rankins v. Chowan County, No. CA-94-10-5CT-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
AFFIRMED.
We note in the alternative that the prosecutors are absolutely immune from
damages; the defense attorney was not a state actor, and no facts stating the
potential liability of the county were provided