Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Ray Deloach v. Stephanie King Barbara Wheeler, 97 F.3d 1446, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    William Ray Deloach filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Stephanie King and Barbara Wheeler which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the reasoning of the district court in denying Deloach relief on his § 1983 complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 97 F.3d 1446 Docket: 96-6303

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Ray Deloach filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Stephanie King and Barbara Wheeler which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the reasoning of the district court in denying Deloach relief on his § 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    William Ray Deloach v. Stephanie King Barbara Wheeler, 97 F.3d 1446, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Ray Deloach filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Stephanie King and Barbara Wheeler which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the reasoning of the district court in denying Deloach relief on his § 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    97 F.

    3d 1446

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William Ray DELOACH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Stephanie KING; Barbara Wheeler, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6303.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
    Decided Oct. 1, 1996.

    William Ray Deloach, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Deloach v. King, No. CA-95-621-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 23,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like