Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone Richard A. Young George Deeds, 86 F.3d 1148, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 3, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit adopts the reasoning of the district court in its January 3, 1996 opinion. The court dispenses with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 86 F.3d 1148 Docket: 96-6065

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 3, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit adopts the reasoning of the district court in its January 3, 1996 opinion. The court dispenses with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone Richard A. Young George Deeds, 86 F.3d 1148, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 3, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit adopts the reasoning of the district court in its January 3, 1996 opinion. The court dispenses with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    86 F.

    3d 1148

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Ronald J. ANGELONE; Richard A. Young; George Deeds,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6065.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted May 16, 1996.
    Decided June 3, 1996.

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Altizer v. Angelone, No. CA-96-3-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 3,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like