Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Atkins v. Ron Angelone, 91 F.3d 128, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from July 31, 1996. It affirms the district court's dismissal of Anthony Atkins' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Ron Angelone as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that decision. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not required.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 91 F.3d 128 Docket: 96-6296

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from July 31, 1996. It affirms the district court's dismissal of Anthony Atkins' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Ron Angelone as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that decision. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not required.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Anthony Atkins v. Ron Angelone, 91 F.3d 128, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from July 31, 1996. It affirms the district court's dismissal of Anthony Atkins' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Ron Angelone as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that decision. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not required.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    91 F.

    3d 128

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Ron ANGELONE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-6296.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: July 23, 1996.
    Decided: July 31, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-149-R)
    Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Angelone, No. CA-96-149-R
    (W.D.Va. Feb. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like