Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William F. Johnson Brian S. Martin v. Ronald Angelone, 103 F.3d 118, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a motion for a temporary restraining order filed by two pro se appellants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the motion. The appeals court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-11-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 103 F.3d 118 Docket: 96-6847

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a motion for a temporary restraining order filed by two pro se appellants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the motion. The appeals court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    William F. Johnson Brian S. Martin v. Ronald Angelone, 103 F.3d 118, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of a motion for a temporary restraining order filed by two pro se appellants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the motion. The appeals court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    103 F.

    3d 118

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William F. JOHNSON; Brian S. Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v.
    Ronald ANGELONE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-6847.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Nov. 7, 1996.
    Decided: Nov. 19, 1996.

    William F. Johnson, Brian S. Martin, Appellants Pro Se.


    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice their
    motion for a temporary restraining order. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Angelone, No. CA-96-151-AM
    (E.D.Va. May 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like