Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Robert Allen Bane filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Virginia Department of Corrections officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit cited its local rule against citing unpublished dispositions except for res judicata, estoppel, or law of the case purposes.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 91 F.3d 128 Docket: 96-6249

    Original Title

    Robert Allen Bane v. L.M. Saunders Ron Angelone Virginia Department of Corrections Officer Silvea Sprouse, Correctional Officer, 91 F.3d 128, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Allen Bane filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Virginia Department of Corrections officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit cited its local rule against citing unpublished dispositions except for res judicata, estoppel, or law of the case purposes.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Allen Bane filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Virginia Department of Corrections officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit cited its local rule against citing unpublished dispositions except for res judicata, estoppel, or law of the case purposes.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    91 F.

    3d 128

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Robert Allen BANE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    L.M. SAUNDERS; Ron ANGELONE; Virginia Department of
    Corrections; Officer Silvea; Sprouse,
    Correctional Officer, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 96-6249.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: June 20, 1996
    Decided July 1, 1996.

    Robert Allen Bane, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant
    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Bane v. Saunders, No. CA-95-729-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 11,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like