Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Julius E. Ruffin v. Larry D. Huffman David K. Smith T. Bert, Institutional Health and Safety Inspector, 91 F.3d 133, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from July 1, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Julius E. Ruffin on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit adopts the reasoning of the district court in Ruffin v. Huffman, No. CA-94-538-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 6, 1996) and dispenses with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 91 F.3d 133 Docket: 96-6244

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from July 1, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Julius E. Ruffin on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit adopts the reasoning of the district court in Ruffin v. Huffman, No. CA-94-538-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 6, 1996) and dispenses with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Julius E. Ruffin v. Larry D. Huffman David K. Smith T. Bert, Institutional Health and Safety Inspector, 91 F.3d 133, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from July 1, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Julius E. Ruffin on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit adopts the reasoning of the district court in Ruffin v. Huffman, No. CA-94-538-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 6, 1996) and dispenses with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    91 F.

    3d 133

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Julius E. RUFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Larry D. HUFFMAN; David K. Smith; T. Bert, Institutional
    Health and Safety Inspector, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6244.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 20, 1996.
    Decided July 1, 1996.

    Julius E. Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF


    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Before HALL, WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Ruffin v. Huffman, No. CA-94-538-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 6,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like