Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jimmie Nelson v. Martin Gorski, Officer Michael Carrier, Investigator Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer, 72 F.3d 127, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Jimmie Nelson filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials Martin Gorski, Michael Carrier, and Angela Ruing which was denied by the district court. Nelson appealed to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-12-20 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 72 F.3d 127 Docket: 95-6440

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jimmie Nelson filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials Martin Gorski, Michael Carrier, and Angela Ruing which was denied by the district court. Nelson appealed to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Jimmie Nelson v. Martin Gorski, Officer Michael Carrier, Investigator Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer, 72 F.3d 127, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jimmie Nelson filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials Martin Gorski, Michael Carrier, and Angela Ruing which was denied by the district court. Nelson appealed to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    72 F.

    3d 127
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Jimmie NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Martin GORSKI, Officer; Michael Carrier, Investigator;
    Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6440.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 14, 1995.
    Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

    Jimmie Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY &


    KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Nelson v. Gorski, No. CA-94-224-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like