Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Darrell Nelson v. Lynn C. Phillips W.E. McMichael Jr. Richard T. Duke, Jr. Franklin Freeman, 66 F.3d 316, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Darrell Nelson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion and reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 66 F.3d 316 Docket: 95-6920

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Darrell Nelson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion and reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Darrell Nelson v. Lynn C. Phillips W.E. McMichael Jr. Richard T. Duke, Jr. Franklin Freeman, 66 F.3d 316, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Darrell Nelson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion and reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    66 F.

    3d 316

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Darrell NELSON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Lynn C. PHILLIPS; W.E. McMichael, Jr.; Richard T. Duke,
    Jr.; Franklin Freeman, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-6920.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 24, 1995.
    Decided Sept. 18, 1995.

    Darrell Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration.
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Nelson v. Phillips, No. CA-95-260-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1995; May 15,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like