Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Danny Alan Vestal v. Franklin Freeman, 66 F.3d 318, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Danny Alan Vestal filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Franklin Freeman in district court that was denied. Vestal appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Vestal's § 1983 complaint against Freeman. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for the court to make a decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 66 F.3d 318 Docket: 95-6938

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Danny Alan Vestal filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Franklin Freeman in district court that was denied. Vestal appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Vestal's § 1983 complaint against Freeman. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for the court to make a decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Danny Alan Vestal v. Franklin Freeman, 66 F.3d 318, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Danny Alan Vestal filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Franklin Freeman in district court that was denied. Vestal appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the denial of Vestal's § 1983 complaint against Freeman. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for the court to make a decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    66 F.

    3d 318

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Danny Alan VESTAL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Franklin FREEMAN, Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 95-6938.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
    Decided: Sept. 18, 1995.

    Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Vestal v. Freeman, No. CA-95-422-F (E.D.N.C.
    May 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like