Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cornelius Strong v. Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Richard Lanham, Commissioner, 97 F.3d 1449, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Cornelius Strong filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services and the Commissioner. The district court denied relief on Strong's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or in its reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 97 F.3d 1449 Docket: 96-6611

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cornelius Strong filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services and the Commissioner. The district court denied relief on Strong's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or in its reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Cornelius Strong v. Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Richard Lanham, Commissioner, 97 F.3d 1449, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cornelius Strong filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services and the Commissioner. The district court denied relief on Strong's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or in its reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    97 F.

    3d 1449

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Cornelius STRONG, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Bishop ROBINSON, Secretary of Public Safety and
    Correctional
    Services; Richard Lanham, Commissioner,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 96-6611.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 22, 1996.
    Decided Sept. 5, 1996.

    Cornelius Strong, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant


    Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Strong v. Robinson, No. CA-95-3370-JFM (D.Md. Mar.
    29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like