Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Guy Lancaster Richmond v. Warden Waters Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 87 F.3d 1309, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Guy Lancaster Richmond on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 87 F.3d 1309 Docket: 96-6171

    Original Title

    Guy Lancaster Richmond v. Warden Waters Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 87 F.3d 1309, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Guy Lancaster Richmond on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Guy Lancaster Richmond v. Warden Waters Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 87 F.3d 1309, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Guy Lancaster Richmond on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    87 F.

    3d 1309

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Guy Lancaster RICHMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Warden WATERS; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6171.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 16, 1996.
    Decided: June 5, 1996.

    Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Richmond v. Waters, No. CA-95-2901 (D.Md. Jan. 22,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like