Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, 76 F.3d 376, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appeals court also denied Nasim's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 76 F.3d 376 Docket: 95-7760

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appeals court also denied Nasim's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    United States v. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, 76 F.3d 376, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appeals court also denied Nasim's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    76 F.

    3d 376

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 95-7760.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: January 18, 1996.
    Decided: February 8, 1996.

    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. 2255
    (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for
    appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
    States v. Nasim, No. CR-88-378-HM; CA-95-2816-S (D.Md. Sept. 25, 1995).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like