Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. William David Mason, 81 F.3d 152, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    William Mason appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 27, 1995 order denying Mason's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials submitted and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 81 F.3d 152 Docket: 95-7299

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Mason appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 27, 1995 order denying Mason's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials submitted and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    United States v. William David Mason, 81 F.3d 152, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Mason appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 27, 1995 order denying Mason's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials submitted and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    81 F.

    3d 152

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    William David MASON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 95-7299.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: March 21, 1996.
    Decided: April 2, 1996.

    William David Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Raymond Hawley, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. 2255
    (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find no reversible error. See United States v. Crittendon, 883 F.2d 326,
    330-31 (4th Cir.1989). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Mason, Nos. CR-92-22; CA-95-1941-6-3 (D.S.C. July
    27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like