Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shawneequa M. Graham v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ivan Selin, Chairman, 73 F.3d 357, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    Shawneequa Graham filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its chairman. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-04 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 73 F.3d 357 Docket: 95-1851

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Shawneequa Graham filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its chairman. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Shawneequa M. Graham v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ivan Selin, Chairman, 73 F.3d 357, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Shawneequa Graham filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its chairman. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    73 F.

    3d 357
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Shawneequa M. GRAHAM, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
    COMMISSION; Ivan Selin,
    Chairman, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-1851.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 12, 1995.
    Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

    Shawneequa M. Graham, Appellant Pro Se.


    David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellees' summary
    judgment motion in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. United
    States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, No. CA-93-1808-DKC (D.Md. Mar. 12,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like